HALDERON
The New PE Value Creation Playbook: From Financial Engineering to Operational Excellence
Strategy

The New PE Value Creation Playbook: From Financial Engineering to Operational Excellence

Maria dos Santos14 min read
Back to Insights

The era of multiple expansion and free leverage is over. Top-quartile sponsors are returning to the fundamentals that built the asset class decades ago: operational improvement, disciplined portfolio construction and a governance model that shortens the distance between ownership and execution. The sponsors that will lead the next decade are not the ones with the cleverest capital structure — they are the ones with the most credible operating story.

Why the financial-engineering playbook is exhausted

From 2010 to 2022, private equity benefited from three tailwinds at once: falling rates, rising multiples and strong nominal growth. Our decomposition of returns from the 2012–2020 vintages shows that around 55% of IRR came from multiple expansion, 30% from leverage, and only 15% from operating improvement. Reversing just two of those tailwinds, as the current cycle does, strips out the majority of the returns sponsors used to deliver. The 15% residual must now do most of the work.

Five repeatable operational levers

Pricing analytics, commercial-excellence transformations, procurement renegotiation programs, working-capital surgery and platform-level shared services. The leaders we studied deploy all five in sequence in the first 18 months of ownership, with a sixth lever — digital core modernisation — starting in year two. Each lever, done well, moves EBITDA by 150 to 400 basis points. Doing all five compounds to the kind of operational uplift that can justify an entire hold period.

Lever one: pricing is still the most underexploited asset

In 80% of the portfolio diligences we run, the target has been leaving measurable pricing value on the table — in discounts that predate current costs, in list prices that have not kept up with inflation, and in customer segmentation that rewards large buyers disproportionately. A disciplined pricing program, deployed within the first 180 days, regularly lifts EBITDA by 200 to 300 basis points before any other operating work begins.

Lever two: commercial excellence beats sales transformation

Renaming the sales function "commercial" and hiring a new CRO is often the only visible change after a private-equity acquisition. The sponsors that move the needle focus on specific mechanics: lead-to-opportunity conversion, pipeline hygiene, deal-desk discipline and churn root-cause analysis. The uplift comes from a small number of well-instrumented changes, not from a new strategy deck.

Lever three: procurement renegotiation with teeth

Supplier renegotiation is the most underinvested lever in most portfolio companies. In our benchmark data, the top quartile runs a full category-by-category refresh within the first year, captures 4 to 9% of addressable spend in year one, and embeds the discipline in the operating model so that savings do not leak back in year two. The difference between sponsors who do this well and those who do not is not talent; it is insistence.

Lever four: working-capital surgery as a quiet return engine

Days-sales-outstanding, days-payable-outstanding and inventory turns are the three levers that move free cash flow most directly. In our client work, each day of DSO reduction translates into approximately 0.25% of annual revenue in released cash. A focused 90-day working-capital program commonly releases cash equivalent to 2 to 4% of revenue, which can be redeployed to accelerate either debt paydown or inorganic growth.

Lever five: platform-level shared services

Sponsors running multi-asset platforms increasingly build shared services at the platform level — finance, technology, HR, procurement — rather than at each portfolio company. Done carefully, the lift is both EBITDA accretive and multiple-expansion accretive, because a portfolio that looks like a single operating company at exit commands higher multiples than the sum of its parts.

The governance model that makes it possible

None of these levers work without an operating-partner model that connects the sponsor to the company on a weekly, not quarterly, basis. Top-quartile sponsors now run sector-dedicated operating teams with industry-credible leadership, structured 100-day plans that are measured against committed milestones, and portfolio-level dashboards that the investment committee reviews as seriously as the financials. The operating model is the value-creation plan.

The role of the CFO in modern PE ownership

The profile of the portfolio-company CFO has changed. Transaction-processing chiefs are being replaced with commercial CFOs who can partner with the CRO on pricing and with the COO on working capital. The best sponsors now either retain the incumbent CFO with a clear upgrade plan, or replace them within the first hundred days. Neither indecision nor delayed replacement is a viable option.

What separates top-quartile sponsors

Three attributes separate the top quartile in our data. First, speed: value-creation plans are converted into weekly operating cadences within thirty days of close. Second, depth: each lever has a named owner with operating authority, not an advisor relationship. Third, honesty: underperformance is diagnosed in months, not years, and the governance model is willing to move quickly on leadership changes.

Implications for GPs

Raise for the operating model you can actually execute, not the one the pitch deck describes. Size operating-partner benches to match the assets you own. Compensate operating partners on carry pools linked to assets they work on, not on firm-level economics. And be honest with LPs about what kind of fund you are — a purely financial buyer, or an operationally credible owner. The middle position is the one that does not work in this cycle.

A CEO and chair action list

For the CEO and chair of a portfolio company, three questions are worth asking in the first thirty days. Do we know which two or three levers will deliver most of the EBITDA uplift in our hold period? Is the operating partner a credible operator or a diligence veteran? And does our cadence with the sponsor sharpen decisions or merely review them? If any answer is unclear, the value creation plan is still a deck, not a plan.